Pages

Thursday, November 7, 2013

American Thinker: Jim Yardley: 'A Different View of Paternalism'



Source:American Thinker- right-wing populist publication.

"The word "paternalism" has been bandied about concerning the various pathetic defenses of Barack Obama's now infamous claim that "If you like your health care, you can keep it. Period."

From the American Thinker 

"Paternalism describes the relationship between the Federal Government and tribes.  It is an important concept to understand when critiquing how Indian Affairs is conducted in light of indigenous rights and sovereignty." 

Source:Sovereign Stories- from them.

From Sovereign Stories

There are two forms of paternalism at least as I see it: one that obviously comes from our parents as shocking as that may sound and I believe the only people it should come from. And as annoying as and in some cases positive parental paternalism may sound, our parents at least tend to have our best interests at heart even when they go too far. 

But then there is what I call governmental paternalism whether it comes from governmental laws, or proposals to create new paternalistic laws and they are basically built around the notion even if they are done with the best intentions, that government knows best what the people themselves need for their own good.  

Things like proposals to outlaw homosexual activity or pornography from the Far-Right. To having the Federal Government regulate marriage in the United States. 

Then there are paternalistic proposals from the Far-Left in trying to regulate what people can eat, drink or smoke for our own good. Because paternalists on the Far-Left believe they know best what people should be eating, drinking and smoking.  

And as much as right-wingers especially those right-wingers who may have some governmental paternalistic views when it comes to social issues, like to label the Affordable Care Act as paternalistic, it is not. Because what it does with the minimum health insurance requirement is to say that everyone is required to have enough health insurance to meet their own individual health care needs.
So people in America can’t past their own health care costs on to other people. The Affordable Care Act doesn’t require people to live healthy and take care of themselves. 

What the ACA says is that we are all responsible for our own health care costs at least those of us who can afford our own health insurance. And for those of us who choose to live unhealthy, they can still do that, but they won’t be able to pass the costs of their unhealthy decisions on to other people.

You can also see this post at FreeState Now, on Blogger.

You can also see this post at FreeState Now, on WordPress.

2 comments:

  1. You can also see this post at FreeState Now:http://freestatenow.blogspot.com/2013/11/american-thinker-opinion-jim-yardley.html on Blogger.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You can also see this post at FreeState Now:https://freestatenowplus.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/american-thinker-opinion-jim-yardley-a-different-view-of-paternalism/ on WordPress.

    ReplyDelete

All relevant comments about the posts you are commenting on are welcome but spam and personal comments are not.

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat
Source: U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy in 1960