Showing posts with label Amanpour & Company. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amanpour & Company. Show all posts

Thursday, April 4, 2024

Amanpour & Company: 'Charlie Sykes: GOP, Toxic Narcissists & a Fundamentally Broken Congress'

Source:Amanpour & Company talking to Republican political analyst Charlie Sykes.

"Congress is broken. So say staffers and an unprecedented number of elected representatives quitting mid-term. A recent survey by the nonprofit Congressional Management Foundation found that a large majority of senior staffers believe the legislative body is no longer functioning. Conservative political commentator Charlie Sykes joins Michel Martin to discuss "The Great Resignation." 

From Amanpour & Company

As my colleague Kire Schneider wrote about this yesterday: 

"Now why is the MAGA House of Representatives (which is not the entire Congress) a cluster flop? (To clean this up) 

I'll give you a hypothetical: imagine having Communists running private banks and other private, for-profit corporations and a few months later these banks and other businesses go bankrupt. 

Imagine putting sharks in-charged of a giant goldfish tank and a few days later all the goldfish are gone. 

Imagine an airline hiring nothing but blind people, alcoholics and other drug addicts to fly their planes. And within days, all of their planes have crashed, with passengers aboard on every flight. 

My point is,MAGA is not a governing coalition. They're a political cult of political suicide pilots and bombers. They're not in Washington to govern. They're there to defeat as many establishment Republicans (meaning the real Republicans) as they can and to kiss Donald Trump's feet (to keep it clean) as much as possible and to see that he gets back in The White House."


I can't emphasize this enough: it's not the 118th Congress that is a cluster flop. (To paraphrase Tim Miller from The Bulwark) Its the 118th House of Representatives that's a cluster flop. (Or whatever pejorative term that you prefer)

The Senate (which is the functioning half of Congress. Hopefully that's not a newsflash for anyone.) is a functioning institution right now: 

They are confirming executive nominees and Federal judges, 

Doing their oversight 

Keeping the government open 

They already passed an aide package for our allies like Ukraine, Israel, the refugees in Gaza, Taiwan, etc. 

They're doing the things that Congress is supposed to do. 

It's the MAGA controlled House, that look aliens from another planet, trying to figure out how to start a car, answer a phone, tie their shoes, blow their noses, struggling to do the basic things in life, that every competent person takes for granted, because they're so natural for them. 

And I'm not saying all of this because the Senate is controlled by Democrats and the House is controlled by Republicans. Correction: the House is controlled by political militant movement group of suicide pilots and bombers, also known as MAGA. But there's evidence that Speaker Mike Johnson is willing to act like normal Republican and Speaker on issues like Ukraine and the border. But I think he would need help from House Democrats to be able to do that and keep his job. 

But I'm saying all of this because over in the Senate, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who spent the previous 4-6 years as arch-rivals in the Senate, seem to have a constructive working relationship now. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

Amanpour & Company: 'Democracy On Trial: The Case Against Donald Trump For His Role in The 2020 Election'

Source:Amanpour & Company talking to filmmaker Michael Kirk.

"Michael Kirk is the filmmaker behind a new Frontline documentary, "Democracy on Trial.” It charts special counsel Jack Smith's indictment against former President Donald Trump, which alleges federal election interference in 2020. Kirk tells Hari Sreenivasan why he chose to release the film now." 


To be very frank here: unless you are some whacked-out, MAGA militant, who thinks that anyone who opposes you, your movement, and Donald Trump himself, is either some plant from the U.S. Department of Justice, The White House, or the mainstream media, the case against Donald Trump and his Jan. 6 militants is pretty obvious. 

The entire case against Donald Trump in Washington is on video and all the witnesses against former President Trump, are members of his administration. Like Attorney General Bill Barr, his Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, his Vice President Mike Pence, and at least two other of his White House staffers, like Cassidy Hutchinson, who was one of Mark Meadows assistants, and Alyssa Farrah Griffin, who was part of his communications team. 

As well as as all these Conservative Republicans in Georgia like the Secretary of State Brad Raffensburger, or Gabriel Sterling. Go to Arizona with the Republican Speaker of the House Rusty Bowers.

Assuming that Donald Trump loses his presidential immunity appeal at the Washington Federal appeals court, (which I believe is a safe bet) he's going on trial perhaps at the latest in the late spring this year, in Washington, with all this video evidence, all the phone calls, the text messages, all the Donald Trump Republican testimony against him, etc. With the Trump team having very little if anything to do to either prevent all this evidence coming in against their client. Or be able to contradict any of the evidence that will be shown against their client.

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Tuesday, January 23, 2024

Amanpour & Company: George Conway: 'Donald Trump Deserves To Spend The Rest of His Life in Prison'

Source:Amanpour & Company talking to Conservative Washington lawyer George Conway.

"Former President Trump continues to ricochet between the courthouse and the campaign trail. This morning, he was back to face a trial for his statements about former columnist E. Jean Carroll's sexual assault allegations in 2019. Meanwhile, just ahead of the New Hampshire primary he got a boost from Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who decided to drop out of the race and back Trump. Conservative lawyer George Conway joins Michel Martin with incisive analysis of Trump's legal woes and how they are shaping his campaign." 


I'm not one of these anti-Trumper's who argue that Donald Trump is an idiot. I think there's a real level of street intelligence and even education as far as how laws works in America and how can take advantage for them. His whole career in business and using the tax code to his own advantage are perfect examples of that. 

Donald Trump knows that if he's not reelected in President in 2024, he's going to prison because he'll be convicted this year, if the Supreme Court simply declares the obvious here and that no American, including sitting President's, as well as former President's, are above the law and are bound to follow the same laws as the average Joe or Mary citizen on the street. 

The only reason why Donald Trump as a 77 year old man is running for President again at all, instead of trying to enjoy his golden years in private life, is because his golden years are over. He stays as a free man as President for 4 years, or goes to prison after conviction, barring some future Republican President pardoning him perhaps in the early 2030s, which is down the road and perhaps too late for him.

As far as why Donald Trump's loyalists never leaving him: (and I'm talking about his loyalists on the street. Not politicians who kiss his ass for their own political futures) it's because Donald Trump represents basically the old America. The America that was dominated by blue-collar, Anglo-Saxon Protestants and other Northern European Americans, who come from small towns and other rural areas in America. Who believe that their America is disappearing and has been going downhill since the 1960s with the civil rights laws, the new immigration laws, that allowed people who weren't just from Canada, or the United Kingdom, or Northern Western Europe, to immigrate to America. 

The MAGA movement sees a man whose from Queens, New York, who made his career in Manhattan, New York, is about as yippie and white-collar a place that you'll ever see anywhere in the world, who claims to be a billionaire, as their blue-collar hero, who who will bring their old America back and take the power away from the new Americans, who are people who didn't come here on the Mayflower. That's all their support is about. 

This has nothing to do with defending individual freedom, because they don't believe in that. Or defending the U.S. Constitution, because they don't believe in that either. This is not about defending the rule of law, obviously, because their cult hero has 91 indictments against him and plenty of evidence to convict him on everything. This is about taking down the new America bringing their America back. And they see Donald Trump and his MAGA movement as the people to accomplish that for him.  

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Friday, December 22, 2023

Amanpour & Company: Stephen Vladek: 'How Will SCOTUS Rule on Donald Trump’s Jan. 6. Legal Case?'

Source:Amanpour & Company interviewing Professor of Law Stephen Vladek. 

"The U.S. Supreme Court is facing several landmark cases while their approval ratings remain at a record low. Professor of law Stephen Vladek joins Hari Sreenivasan to discuss the cases attracting attention — from the trials awaiting Donald Trump to a vital reproductive rights decision — and whether we are witnessing a constitutional crisis in the nation's highest court." 


"The double jeopardy protection applies in both state and federal courts. It only applies in criminal cases and criminal law. Thus, the protection does not apply in civil lawsuits.

The double jeopardy rule also bars multiple punishments for lesser included offenses. A lesser included offense is an offense that the government must necessarily prove to convict someone for a greater offense. Suppose the federal government charges a criminal defendant with burglary and trespass. The government attorney must prove the defendant trespassed to prove they committed burglary. Thus, the court cannot impose additional punishment on the defendant for both the trespass and the burglary.

When Does Double Jeopardy Attach?
Double jeopardy attaches at different times depending on the type of criminal trial. In a jury trial, it typically attaches when the court swears in the jurors. In a bench trial, it attaches when the court swears in the first witness to testify.

Once double jeopardy attaches, the government typically cannot call for a second prosecution of a criminal defendant for the same criminal offense. However, there are some exceptions to the general rule." 

From Find Law

As I wrote yesterday on The New Democrat

"I think the question in Donald Trump's immunity case is where do any former U.S. President has presidential immunity from prosecution in criminal cases, even for actions that they committed while they were President. 

I think the answer to this presidential immunity question is obviously no, for the simple fact that we are a constitutional, federal republic and we have a liberal democratic, federal form of government. And a big part our our constitutional system is that no one is above the law, no one is below the law, including the most powerful people in the country, including the most powerful person in the country, the President of the United States. 

And I'll give you another prediction as a non-lawyer. The Supreme Court will rule against Donald Trump's immunity claim, but as Joan Biskupic said in the CNN video, they'll allow for Donald Trump's lawyers to ,make other defenses in his Washington trial. 

The reason why I believe the U.S. Supreme Court will rule against Donald Trump's immunity claim and I don't think it will be close, perhaps just Clarence Thomas rules in favor of Trump, if he doesn't recuse himself from the case, but the reason why I believe this, is I have a hard time believing that there are 5 Republicans on the Supreme Court, who believe that Joe Biden, or any other future Democratic President, should have presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, which is exactly what will happen if DJT wins this. 

The other reason why I believe SCOTUS will rule against DJT is a practical one.  If DJT were to get immunity here, the President and future President's would just be able to order his cabinet members and other executive officials to take actions that he knows are illegal and unconstitutional, knowing that he can't be prosecuted and telling his people essentially, don't worry about it, he'll pardon them, even if they're caught. " 

I put in the quote having to do with double jeopardy because that's one of the claims the Donald Trump's Washington lawyers are making for why the former President shouldn't even be tried at all for his role in the January 6, 2021 insurrection. They're arguing that President Trump was already impeached, tried, and acquitted in Congress. The House of Representatives impeached President Trump and then the Senate acquitted him. 

But once again I'm not a lawyer. And if you are taking the time to count how many times I've said that in just the last 6 months, I suggest you get a life. But double jeopardy only apples to civil and criminal cases, not Congressional. After DJT loses on presidential immunity, (and I believe he will for reasons I've already given) he'll lose on double jeopardy as well and will head to trial in Washington in the spring of 2024.

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Tuesday, December 12, 2023

Amanpour & Company: 'If Donald Trump Wins: Inviting The Dark Ages Across The Planet'

Source:Amanpour & Company- talking to The Atlantic Magazine editor Jeffrey Goldberg.

"Jeffrey Goldberg is Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic. He recently launched a special edition of the magazine, warning of the grave and extreme consequences if Trump were to become president again. He tells the show why a second term would be even more dangerous than the first." 


"Like many reporters, I’ve been operating in Casaubon mode for much of the past eight years, searching for the key to Donald Trump’s mythologies. No single explanation of Trump is fully satisfactory, although Atlantic staff writer Adam Serwer came closest when he observed that the cruelty is the point. Another person who helped me unscramble the mystery of Trump was his son-in-law Jared Kushner. Early in the Trump presidency, I had lunch with Kushner in his White House office. We were meant to be discussing Middle East peace (more on that another time), but I was particularly curious to hear Kushner talk about his father-in-law’s behavior. I was not inured then—and am not inured even now—to the many rococo manifestations of Trump’s defective character. One of the first moments of real shock for me came in the summer of 2015, when Trump, then an implausible candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, said of Senator John McCain, “He’s not a war hero … I like people who weren’t captured, okay?” 


Just to be completely honest and accurate: (not that I'm ever not completely honest and accurate) we don't know what a 2nd Donald Trump presidency would look like. And besides that, he would have to get reelected first. And he might have to do that as a bankrupt and convicted felon, whose currently confined in prison, waiting on his sentence, after being remanded by Judge Tanya Chutkan. You can look at the polls all you want, but Donald Tump has a long, uphill, road to climb, before he even gets reelected again. 

Having said all of that, I don't want to wait and find out what a 2nd Donald Trump presidency could look like. I don't think America can afford to take chance on him, because of what Jeffrey Goldberg and others have said. Which is why the U.S. Government, as well as American voters who love not just love America, but want to preserve and defend our liberal democracy, rule of law, and checks and balances, need to legally do whatever we can, to prevent Donald Trump from getting anywhere near The White House ever again. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Thursday, December 7, 2023

Amanpour & Company: 'Civil War Confederate President Wasn’t Tried, Why It Matters In Donald Trump Case'

Source:Amanpour & Company talking to New Yorker columnist Jill Lepore.

"Donald Trump made history as the first U.S. president to be criminally indicted. But he is not the first ex-president to undergo prosecution. In her latest piece for The New Yorker, Jill Lepore argues that the failure of the American government to prosecute Jefferson Davis, former president of the Confederacy, more than 150 years ago, could hold lessons for America as Trump awaits trial. Lepore joins the show." 


"Jefferson Davis, the half-blind ex-President of the Confederate States of America, leaned on a cane as he hobbled into a federal courthouse in Richmond, Virginia. Only days before, a Chicago Tribune reporter, who’d met Davis on the boat ride to Richmond, had written that “his step is light and elastic.” But in court, facing trial for treason, Davis, fifty-eight, gave every appearance of being bent and broken. A reporter from Kentucky described him as “a gaunt and feeble-looking man,” wearing a soft black hat and a sober black suit, as if he were a corpse. He’d spent two years in a military prison. He wanted to be released. A good many Americans wanted him dead. “We’ll hang Jeff Davis from a sour-apple tree,” they sang to the tune of “John Brown’s Body.”

Davis knew the courthouse well. Richmond had been the capital of the Confederacy and the courthouse its headquarters. The rebel President and his cabinet had used the courtroom as a war room, covering its walls with maps. He’d used the judge’s chambers as his Presidential office. He’d last left that room on the night of April 2, 1865, while Richmond fell.

Two years later, when Davis doddered into that courtroom, many of the faces he saw were Black. Among the two hundred spectators, a quarter were Black freedmen. And then the grand jury filed in. Six of its eighteen members were Black, the first Black men to serve on a federal grand jury. Fields Cook, born a slave, was a Baptist minister. John Oliver, born free, had spent much of his life in Boston. George Lewis Seaton’s mother, Lucinda, had been enslaved at Mount Vernon. Cornelius Liggan Harris, a Black shoemaker, later recalled how, when he took his seat with the grand jury and eyed the defendant, “he looked on me and smiled.”

Not many minutes later, Davis walked out a free man, released on bail. And not too many months after that the federal government’s case against him fell apart. There’s no real consensus about why. The explanation that Davis’s lawyer Charles O’Conor liked best had to do with Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the disqualification clause, which bars from federal office anyone who has ever taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and later “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” O’Conor argued that Section 3’s ban on holding office was a form of punishment and that to try Davis for treason would therefore amount to double jeopardy. It’s a different kind of jeopardy lately. In the aftermath of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, legal scholars, including leading conservatives, have argued that the clause disqualifies Donald Trump from running for President. Challenges calling for Trump’s name to be blocked from ballots have been filed in twenty-eight states. Eleven cases have been dismissed by courts or voluntarily withdrawn. The Supreme Court might have the final say.

The American Presidency is draped in a red-white-and-blue cloak of impunity. Trump is the first President to have been impeached twice and the first ex-President to have been criminally indicted. If he’s convicted and sentenced and—unlikeliest of all—goes to prison, he will be the first in those dishonors, too. He faces four criminal trials, for a total of ninety-one felony charges. Thirty-four of those charges concern the alleged Stormy Daniels coverup, forty address Trump’s handling of classified documents containing national-defense information, and the remainder, divided between a federal case in Washington, D.C., and a state case in Georgia, relate to his efforts to overturn the 2020 Presidential election, including by inciting an armed insurrection to halt the certification of the Electoral College vote by a joint session of Congress. His very infamy is unprecedented.

The insurrection at the Capitol cost seven lives. The Civil War cost seven hundred thousand. And yet Jefferson Davis was never held responsible for any of those deaths. His failed conviction leaves no trail. Still, it had consequences. If Davis had been tried and convicted, the cloak of Presidential impunity would be flimsier. Leniency for Davis also bolstered the cause of white supremacy. First elected to the Senate, from Mississippi, in 1848, Davis believed in slavery, states’ rights, and secession, three ideas in one. Every state had a right to secede, Davis insisted in his farewell address to the Senate, in 1861, and Mississippi had every reason to because “the theory that all men are created free and equal” had been “made the basis of an attack upon her social institutions,” meaning slavery. Weeks later, Davis became the President of the Confederacy. His Vice-President, Alexander Stephens, said that the cornerstone of the new government “rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man.” Trump could win his Lost Cause, too.

Davis fled Richmond seven days before Robert E. Lee surrendered to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox. “I’m bound to oppose the escape of Jeff. Davis,” Abraham Lincoln reportedly told General William Tecumseh Sherman, “but if you could manage to have him slip out unbeknownst-like, I guess it wouldn’t hurt me much.” After Lincoln was shot and killed, on April 15th, his successor, Andrew Johnson, issued a proclamation charging that Lincoln’s assassination had been “incited, concerted, and procured by” Davis and offering a reward of a hundred thousand dollars for his arrest." 

Union troops captured Davis in Georgia on May 10th as he attempted to sneak out of a tent while wearing his wife’s shawl. He was conveyed to a military prison in Virginia. Captain Henry Wirz, who had served as the commandant of an infamous Confederate prison in Andersonville, Georgia, where thirteen thousand Union soldiers died of starvation and exposure, was captured three days before Davis. Tried before a military commission, Wirz was found guilty and hanged.

From the start, the prosecution of the former rebel President was more complicated. “I never cease to regret that Jeff. Davis was not shot at the time of his capture,” the dauntless Massachusetts senator Charles Sumner said. Sumner wanted Davis tried, like Wirz, before a military commission. “I am anxiously looking forward to Jefferson Davis’s Trial,” the Columbia law professor Francis Lieber wrote to Sumner at the close of Wirz’s trial. But “suppose he is not found guilty; is he not, in that case, completely restored to his citizenship, and will he not sit by your side again in the Senate? And be the Democratic candidate for the next presidency? I do not joke.”

Lieber, who grew up in Prussia, had taught at South Carolina College for twenty years before moving to Columbia, in 1857. “Behold in me the symbol of civil war,” he once wrote. A son of his who fought for the Confederacy had been killed; another, who fought for the Union, had lost an arm. During the war, Lieber had prepared a set of rules of war that Lincoln issued as General Orders 100, better known as the Lieber Code. (It later formed the framework of the Geneva Convention.) Edwin Stanton, the Secretary of War, appointed Lieber to head the newly created Archive Office, charged with collecting Confederate records. Lieber fully expected to find evidence showing a “perfect connexion” between Davis and Lincoln’s assassination. That evidence was not forthcoming. Johnson vacillated, but by the end of 1865 he decided that he wanted Davis tried not for war crimes but for treason.

The Constitution defines treason as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies. If Davis couldn’t be convicted of treason, the Philadelphia Inquirer remarked, “we may as well . . . expunge at once the word from our dictionaries.” Although Congress had modified the definition of treason in 1862, there remained ambiguity about what distinguished it from rebellion or insurrection. Lieber hoped that the prosecution would “stamp treason as treason,” but he was worried. “The whole Rebellion is beyond the Constitution,” he maintained. “The Constitution was not made for such a state of things.” In 1864, he quietly circulated to Congress a list of proposed constitutional amendments, including one that would end slavery, or what became the Thirteenth Amendment. (“Let us have no ‘slavery is dead,’ ” he wrote to Sumner. “It is not dead. Nothing is dead until it is killed.”) He also proposed an amendment guaranteeing equal rights regardless of race, or what became the Fourteenth Amendment. And he proposed an amendment clarifying the relationship between treason and rebellion: “It shall be a high crime directly to incite to armed resistance to the authority of the United States, or to establish or to join Societies or Combinations, secret or public, the object of which is to offer armed resistance to the authority of the United States, or to prepare for the same by collecting arms, organizing men, or otherwise.” Lieber’s Insurrection Amendment was never ratified. If it had been, Americans would live in a very different country.

Can Donald Trump get a fair trial? Is trying Trump the best thing for the nation? Is the possibility of acquittal worth the risk? Every trial on charges related to the insurrection gives him a stage for making the case that he won the 2020 election, any acquittal will be taken as a vindication, and his supporters will question the legitimacy of any conviction. But failure to try him is an affront not only to democracy but to decency.

In 1865, plenty of Americans wanted Davis tried without delay. A rope-maker from Illinois wrote to Johnson, volunteering to make the rope to hang him. But U.S. Attorney General James Speed, belying his name, wanted to slow things down. Americans were still mourning Lincoln and all that they had lost in the war. Speed, cautious by nature, wanted temperatures to cool. Many feared that bringing Davis to trial risked handing a rather stunning victory to the defeated Confederacy, as the legal historian Cynthia Nicoletti argued in a brilliant and exhaustively researched 2017 book, “Secession on Trial: The Treason Prosecution of Jefferson Davis.” To a charge of treason, Davis was expected to respond that he had forfeited his American citizenship when Mississippi seceded from the United States, and you cannot commit treason against another country. According to Nicoletti, the worry that an acquittal would have established the constitutionality of secession meant that interest in prosecuting Davis simply evaporated. There are other views. In a 2019 book, “Treason on Trial: The United States v. Jefferson Davis,” Robert Icenhauer-Ramirez, a former criminal-defense attorney, wrote that the prosecution unravelled because the men involved in it had towering political ambitions and were unwilling to risk losing so prominent a case. Neither explanation covers all the facts." 


"Jefferson F. Davis (June 3, 1808 – December 6, 1889) was an American politician who served as the first and only president of the Confederate States of America from 1861 to 1865. He represented Mississippi in the United States Senate and the House of Representatives as a member of the Democratic Party before the American Civil War. He was the United States Secretary of War from 1853 to 1857.

Davis, the youngest of ten children, was born in Fairview, Kentucky, but spent most of his childhood in Wilkinson County, Mississippi. His eldest brother Joseph Emory Davis secured the younger Davis's appointment to the United States Military Academy. Upon graduating, he served six years as a lieutenant in the United States Army. After leaving the army in 1835, Davis married Sarah Knox Taylor, daughter of general and future President Zachary Taylor. Sarah died from malaria three months after the wedding. Davis became a cotton planter, building Brierfield Plantation in Mississippi on his brother Joseph's land and eventually owning as many as 113 slaves.

In 1845, Davis married Varina Howell. During the same year, he was elected to the United States House of Representatives, serving for one year. From 1846 to 1847, he fought in the Mexican–American War as the colonel of a volunteer regiment. He was appointed to the United States Senate in 1847, resigning to unsuccessfully run as governor of Mississippi. In 1853, President Franklin Pierce appointed him Secretary of War. After Pierce's administration ended in 1857, Davis returned to the Senate. He resigned in 1861 when Mississippi seceded from the United States.

During the Civil War, Davis guided the Confederacy's policies and served as its commander in chief. When the Confederacy was defeated in 1865, Davis was captured, accused of treason, and imprisoned at Fort Monroe. He was released without trial after two years. Immediately after the war, Davis was often blamed for the Confederacy's defeat, but after his release from prison, he became a hero of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy. In the late 19th and the 20th centuries, his legacy as Confederate leader was celebrated in the South. In the twenty-first century, he is frequently criticized as a supporter of slavery and racism, and many of the memorials dedicated to him throughout the United States have been removed." 

From Wikipedia

As Jill Lepore already mentioned in this video, Jefferson Davis wasn't tried for treason against the United States of America, because he renounced his American citizenship, when he became the President of the Confederate States, which of course was at war with the U.S. Government in the 1960s during the American Civil War. 

That's not the case with Donald J. Trump, who obviously is still an American citizen (as much as lot of Americans hate that fact and consider him an embarrassment to the country) and therefor is eligible to be tried for treason and insurrection, for his role in overthrowing the democratically, certified 2020 presidential election. 

I don't think there's any question that Donald Trump has to be tried for his role in the 2021 insurrection, both in Washington and Atlanta, at least. Apparently Michigan, Nevada, and perhaps Pennsylvania, are considering their own prosecutions against the former President as well. 

The reason why Donald Trump has to be tried for his role in January 6, 2021, is because if he weren't at least tried, (and I'm very confident he'll be convicted in Washington, at least) it would send a horrible signal to the rest of the far-right in America, that they could do this again in the future. As well as the militant far-left, who aren't exactly in love with American liberal democracy either. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Thursday, November 30, 2023

Amanpour & Company: 'Tom Nichols On Donald Trump’s Recent Rhetoric: 'An Actual Fascist Has Shown Up'

Source:Amanpour & Company talking to the editor of The Atlantic Magazine editor Tom Nichols.

"In a new article for The Atlantic, staff writer Tom Nichols sounds the alarm on former President Trump’s fascist rhetoric. In his article “Trump Crosses a Crucial Line," Nichols lays out his increasing concern about the language showing up in Trump's speeches -- language which Nichols argues is aligning more and more with the history and methods of fascism. He joins Michel Martin to discuss the threat this poses to American democracy." 


"Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement,[1][2][3] characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy." 

From Wikipedia

The guess the only thing I would add the Wikipedia definition of fascism, is that Communists, or at least Communists leaders at least practice fascism as well. They go by the policy that you either agree with the Communist State on everything, or they'll lock you up, or perhaps just murder you before they lock you up. The People's Republic of China, the Communist Republic of Korea, are excellent examples of that. The Communist Republic of Cuba, still has a lot of political prisoners as well. 

I disagree with Tom Nichols, at least a little bit on this. I agree with him that political labels like liberal, which is now used by the mainstream media, at least, to describe every radical movement on the Left, when actual Liberals believe in liberal democracy, which is a center-right form of government, fascist gets thrown around too much as well. Tom Nichols, who was a longtime Republican, is basically a Liberal or Classical Liberal Republican, at least ideologically.

But I'm not sure there's any real political ideology that defines Mr. Trump individually. He governed as a right-wing, alt-right, Northern European, Nationalist in America, who wanted to return America to the people that this movement believes are the real Americans, which are Northern European-Americans, especially Anglo-Saxons and other Northern-European Protestants. But that's how he got elected in 2016 and the philosophy that he stuck with as President. 

But Donald Trump is so narcissistic, that he only cares about himself and sees himself as a king or some other type of dictator, who shouldn't be held accountable to anyone but himself. Which is the only reason why he's running for President again, which is to stay out of prison and keep his allies out of prison. So with his background as both a businesses (and soon to be bankrupt businessman) and now political activist/politician, I think again if there's any real political philosophy that could be used to define Donald Trump's political philosophy, Oligarch might be the best: 

"Oligarchy (from Ancient Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía) 'rule by few'; from ὀλίγος (olígos) 'few', and ἄρχω (árkhō) 'to rule, command')[1][2][3] is a conceptual form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people. These people may or may not be distinguished by one or several characteristics, such as nobility, fame, wealth, education, or corporate, religious, political, or military control.

Throughout history, power structures considered to be oligarchies have often been viewed as coercive, relying on public obedience or oppression to exist. Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as meaning rule by the rich, contrasting it with aristocracy, arguing that oligarchy was the perverted form of aristocracy."

From Wikipedia 

Or corporatocracy: 

"Corporatocracy (/ˌkɔːrpərəˈtɒkrəsi/, from corporate and Greek: -κρατία, romanized: -kratía, lit. 'domination by'; short form corpocracy[1]) is an economic, political and judicial system controlled by business corporations or corporate interests.[2]

The concept has been used in explanations of bank bailouts, excessive pay for CEOs, as well as complaints such as the exploitation of national treasuries, people, and natural resources.[3] It has been used by critics of globalization,[4] sometimes in conjunction with criticism of the World Bank[5] or unfair lending practices,[3] as well as criticism of free trade agreements.[4] Corporate rule is also a common theme in dystopian science-fiction media."

From Wikipedia 

But again, I'm not sure there's any real political ideology that I believe could be used to define Donald Trump's politics. If he thought socialism was the best way to give him absolute power as an individual, he would be a Socialist. Or the same thing with liberalism, or conservatism in its real forms, not how liberalism and conservatism are misdefined today. 

Donald Trump believes in Donald Trump and no one, or anything else. As long as you are on Team Trump, he's loyal to you. But when you do or say anything that goes against him, regardless of whatever your previous relationship was with him, he throws you out like a bag of garbage. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Thursday, November 9, 2023

Amanpour & Company: Election Night Analysis: Why the GOP Is Losing Winnable Races

Source:Amanpour & Company- New York Times national political reporter Astead Herndon.

"In the U.S., Democrats defied the pollsters, holding their ground in last night’s elections. In Virginia, the party gained full control over the state legislature, while Democrat Gabe Amo made history as Rhode Island’s first Black congressman. Astead Herndon, New York Times national politics reporter, joins the show to discuss what these results could mean for next year’s presidential race." 


If I had to sum up the Republican Party's underperformance in 2023, I would say this: it's the culture war, stupid. Stupid being the MAGA wing, which is the Far-Right of the Republican Party,. Which actually isn't very religious, (at least not in any traditional, classical, or American sense) but who base their politics around region, culture, class, and unfortunately, even race and ethnicity. 

When MAGA candidates run in general elections, they run their campaigns as if they're in some ruby red state or district, when the fact is, they might be running in a district or state that's actually more 50-50 as far as Republican and Democrats, or perhaps even leans Democratic, but maybe leans Republican, but is more of a white-collar, center-right community. Communities where the people there, including the Republicans, don't push the culture and social issues, but instead are more interested in the economics, crime, and national security. Not whether there are gays in schools, or too much non-Northern European immigration, too many Democrats voting, too many people who are voting, period, etc.

Yes, Virginia leans more Democratic now because the state is more urban and suburban now. But urban and suburban voters are the voters than even Ronald Reagan was competitive and won over back in the 1960s and 70s as Governor of California and in the 1980s as President of the United States. They used to be solid, center-right, Republican voters. 

And when you have Republican candidates thinking they can just win elections with rural voters, in rural communities, and just win with blue-collar, Anglo-Saxon-Protestant, male and older female voters, they're going to lose in states like Virginia and even Kentucky today, where half of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, lives in Louisville, which is one of the biggest cities in America today. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Thursday, November 2, 2023

Amanpour & Company: 'A Dysfunctional and Destructive Force: Adam Kinzinger On Today’s GOP'

Source:Amanpour & Company interviewing former U.S. Representative Adam Kinzinger (Republican, Illinois)

"The Republican Party continues to be plagued by division. The Senate GOP is still split over the question of a tie-in between aid for Israel and funding for Ukraine. Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger knows this dysfunction all too well. His new memoir "Renegade" details his service on the January 6 House Select Committee as an outcast in his own party. He joins the show to discuss." 


Adam Kinzinger, is no moderate or RINO. He was basically the John McCain of the U.S. House of Representatives. And I'm not just talking about a Republican whose willing to take on his own party, including the leadership, which is what then Senator John McCain did both with then President George W. Bush in the mid 2000s when it came to deficit spending and civil liberties, but then his own leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell over ObamaCare and other issues. 

Adam Kinzinger is one of the original supporters of the 2003 Iraq War, served in that war, he's a real deficit hawk, and supporter of property rights. We're not talking about some wisihy-washy moderate Republican, who served in a district, that had a lot of Democrats in it it. Adam Kinzinger is a true Center-Right, Conservative Republican, who fits in very well in the old Barry Goldwater/Ronald Reagan Republican Party. A political party that's all but gone now in today's Donald Trump's MAGA party.

So when the Adam Kingziner's of the world, the S.E. Cupp's of the world, and other old school Conservative Republicans, not just say that there's something wrong with the modern Republican Party, but they can't be Republicans anymore, because that party no longer represents their conservative values, you need to take those folks seriously and listen to them. 

But if you are part of the Donald Trump cult and see him as nothing more or less than God, or just you are just a political careerist, whose simply looking to hold on to your current job, or obtain more power in the current Republican Party and will do anything that you can to achieve those goals, including sacrificing your own credibility, integrity, and character, then it's only your career and power that you care about and you'll do anything to protect that for yourself. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Friday, October 6, 2023

Amanpour & Company: Hari Sreenivasan Interviewing David Cay Johnston: 'Donald Trump's Whole Life Has Been a Facade'

Source:Amanpour & Company interviewing longtime economics and business journalist David C. Johnston, about Donald J. Trump.

"Donald Trump was back in court today. This time, as the former president answers for his business dealings in New York, his empire could be at stake. The self-described property mogul has already been found liable for “persistent and repeated” fraud in this civil trial. David Cay Johnston is a Pulitzer Prize-winning economics reporter. He joins the show to discuss what this means for the Trump organization." 


4-5 years ago, longtime Republican strategist and now political filmmaker Mark McKinnon, who served for both President George W. Bush and then Senator John McCain, was on CNN Tonight with Don Lemon. And they were talking about the current investigations into Donald Trump dealing with the 2016 presidential campaign and potential investigations that could be facing then President Trump, once he's no longer President, whether he's not reelected in 2020, or leaves office after his 2nd term would've been over in 2025. 

Mark McKinnon told Don Lemon that the biggest personal mistake that Donald Trump ever made in his life, was getting elected President of the United States. The 2nd biggest mistake that he made, according to Mark McKinnon, was running for President of the United States. Why? Because now that Mr. Trump is in the public eye full-time, all these new investigations not just about his presidency, his business career, or personal life, but how his business and personal affairs affect his presidency, will be under public scrutiny.

I'm sure New York City and the State of New York pre-2016 knew or suspected how big of a fraud and crook that Donald Trump really is. But they never went after him, because they probably thought he had too much money and they couldn't convict him in court. 

But with the Trump presidency and now we know what kind of President he was and what kind of President he would be if God (if there is one) really hates America and somehow Mr. Trump becomes President again and with all the private investigations into his personal and business affairs that David C. Johnston and others have done about him and we know about how much debt he's in and what his personal wealth might actually be, all the losses that he reported on his own personal tax returns, the State of New York and New York City feel that they now have no choice but to expose and convict Donald Trump, for the good of the country. 

There was once a real, real-life, true crime, reality TV show, from Investigation Discovery, called "I Almost Got Away With It". Not saying that Donald Trump ever appeared on that show, at least not as an ex-fugitive. But Mr. Trump's whole career has been about getting way with it and screwing innocent people for his own personal profit. (Not in a sexual way, that we know of) 

But now that the light is on and we know not just what kind of person Donald J. Trump is, but what kind of businessman he is, his days as a fraud, at least in the State of New York, Florida might be different for him, but his days as The Don of Manhattan, look like they're coming to an end. But only because he decided that he wanted to be President of the United States and got himself elected. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Wednesday, October 4, 2023

Amanpour & Company: Michel Martin Interviewing Russell Moore: 'We’ve Lost Our Credibility To The Outside World'

Source:Amanpour & Company interviewing Russell Moore.

"Russell Moore is the editor-in-chief of Christianity Today. In his new book he explores democracy, cynicism, and the state of the evangelical church. Moore joins Michel Martin to discuss the challenges of religious identity and his hopes for future expressions of Christianity in America and beyond." 


I'm not a religious at all obviously as an Agnostic, even though I believe in freedom of and from religion for everyone, as well as the separation of church and state. So I'm some what reluctant in using religious rhetoric to make political arguments. 

But what the Evangelical-Right is going through in America right now, with being so political, especially in a partisan way and so invested in one political party, where now it's their politics and what they want to accomplish politically, is more important to them, then their own actual religious values, is not new for them. 

To put it bluntly: the Evangelical-Right sold their soles to The Devil Donald Trump, a man whose not even religious at all, as much as he might claim to be Presbyterian, he's guilty of violating perhaps at least 5 of the 10 Commandants everyday. 

The Trump movement is not a religious movement, or even a conservative movement. It's a nationalistic, hyper-partisan, and at times very militant, political movement of cultural warriors. Not American patriots who want the best for America, who'll defend America and the U.S. Constitution, and republic. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat
Source: U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy in 1960