Ben Meiselas: 'Donald Trump’s Lawyer Makes STUNNING ADMISSION On Live TV'

Source:Medias Touch- Donald Trump propagandist & perhaps Trump University graduate, Alina Habba.

"MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking statement made by Donald Trump’s lawyer Alina Habba on live TV." 

From the Meidas Touch

"New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman said former President Trump is worried the Supreme Court may rule against him on recent decisions in Colorado and Maine that booted him from the 2024 ballot in those states.

Haberman said during an appearance on CNN last week that while Trump largely believes the Supreme Court will rule in his favor, he is also worried that it may not. If the Supreme Court holds up the Colorado ruling, it could lead to other states removing Trump from the ballot under the Constitution’s insurrection clause." 

From The Hill

"Former President Trump’s attorney Alina Habba on Wednesday said the former president is concerned the U.S. Supreme Court justices may “shy away from being pro-Trump,” and rule against him in regard to the recent decisions in Colorado and Maine that kicked him off the states’ 2024 primary ballots.

Responding to New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman’s recent comments about Trump’s concerns, Habba during an interview on Fox News said, “That’s a concern he’s voiced to me, he’s voiced to everybody publicly, not privately. And I can tell you that his concern is a valid one.” 

From The Hill

Again I'm not a lawyer, but there is where Donald Trump's lawyer Alina Habba might be in further trouble with the American Bar Association: "Attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications between a lawyer and their client that relate to the client's seeking of legal advice or services. This protection extends to any information exchanged during these privileged communications, encompassing not only verbal discussions but also written correspondence, emails, text messages, and other forms of communication." 

From Legal Information Institute

As I said in November about Alina Habba on The New Democrat: 

"Alina Habba is not really a trial lawyer. She can barely afford to do whatever she does as a lawyer right now. She's more of a public relations lawyer, if anything at all, who makes her living trying her client's cases on TV and on social media. But she's officially Donald Trump's civil lawyer right now because she's about the best of what's left to try to defend him, because of his own financial situation and all the evidence that's against him right now, in multiple cases. 

Perhaps one of the reasons right now that Alina Habba owes millions of dollars, is because her own client is not paying her. But she's trying to work for him anyway, perhaps banking on the fact that defending a former President of the United States, would lead to clients who can and would pay her very well for her legal advice and actions in the future. But that career strategy is obviously not working out for her right now."

As I wrote back in December on The New Democrat: 

"So to put all of this in English: (or perhaps broken American English) Donald Trump lost his civil immunity case in the E. Jeanne Carrol case, because his own damn lawyer Alina Habba, didn't file her motion in time to win that appeal and give her client civil immunity here. 

My post about DJT's lawyer Alina Habba from back in November still stands here. She's not up to the task, doesn't have the experience, the knowledge, the professionalism, to defend a client at the level of Donald Trump, when you are talking about a former President of the United States and now serial criminal defendant. 

DJT needs much better legal representation. But Alina Habba might be the best of what's left to even consider representing a man who not only commits felonies on a regular basis, but who leaves incriminating evidence against him all over the place, either thinking he'll never get caught, or convicted, or he's simply above the law and has some constitutional right that no other American citizen has." 

As I wrote back in December on The New Democrat: 

"So what what Ben Meiselas is talking about here (and I will get to the point faster) is that Donald Trump's New York County lawyer, Alina Habba, is arguing to the appeals court, that her client Donald Trump has absolute immunity, period. And she referenced Nxon V Fitzgerald, a case that that US Air Force officer Arthur Ernest Fitzgerald made against President Richard Nixon in the early 1970s. " 

As I wrote on The New Democrat: 

"OK, to try to explain Alina Habba and what she's up too or why she does and says the things that she does, especially on national TV, where she'll never be able to run away from her garbage statements, or in court, where again everything piece of trash that she tried to present in court on behalf of her client Donald J. Trump, I can only come up with a few possibilities for why she does this and puts herself through, as someone whose never even met her. 

I guess one possibility is that she's a total moron. But then how the hell she get out of high school, let alone through college and then law school, and then pass the bar exam. So I don't think just labeling her as a total moron makes much sense here. 

I guess another possibility is that Alina Habba is a pathological liar who simply can't help herself and perhaps she's corrupt as well, which would along with her being a compulsive liar, would explain all of her garbage statements as a freakin lawyer, whose supposed to be a member of the American Bar Association. Along with being a pathological liar, she also just happens to be President of the Compulsive Liars of America, (not saying such organization exists) which seems to be a position unlike being a civil defense attorney, that she would be well-qualified for. 

Another possibility and I think one that has real possibility, just based on her statements and behavior, she got her law degree from Trump University, which would explain horrible statements and positions as a lawyer... 

I think crook and pathological liar, are the best possibilities for why Alina Habba does the things that she does and says the things that she does. But you are welcome to weigh in on this as well and tell me what you think about this and her."

As I wrote last week on The New Democrat: 

"Nothing has changed here, other than the fact I guess, if Alina Habba got paid to make a fool of herself on national TV, Oprah Winfrey could go to Alina for loans. I mean Alina Habba would be the richest woman and perhaps person in the entire world, (not just MAGA World, which isn't much bigger than Pluto, in American terms) if her simple job in life was to make a fool for herself, not just on national TV, but in civil court as well. "

As I wrote yesterday on The New Democrat: 

"To go back to back to what Christina Bobb said: They're no longer even trying to argue whether or not their client Donald J Trump is actually innocent at this point. That train left the station back in August when Special Counsel Jack Smith laid out his indictment. What they're doing now, is simply trying to get their client off with all these bogus (to be really kind) arguments that their client is immune from prosecution and lawsuits, simply because he's Donald J. Trump. Because I think they even know that there's no such thing as presidential immunity from prosecution and civil liability, simply because you are the President, or we're the President of the United States. I don't think you need a degree from Trump University to understand that."

Donald Trump's lawyer Christina Bobb: "The presidential immunity, I think they should rule in favor of Donald Trump. Presidential immunity has been in play for the vast majority of our history. Well established that the acts that were alleged in this indictment were in the furtherance of his office in accordance with his office. He's immune from prosecution. Clearly as President of the United States, he believes that there was fraud in the presidential election and he has a constitutional obligation to secure the election and to figure out what was going on. So this is a very clear case that he should be cleared because of presidential immunity." 

Again, notice how Christina Bobb doesn't even try to back up her claim that Donald Trump either has presidential immunity from either criminal prosecution, or has any authority whatsoever to try to interfere as President of the United States, with a state's presidential election. But if she was a good, intelligent, responsible, moral, lawyer, she wouldn't be working for Donald Trump. Also notice how she sounds like she's trying to think about what she says, before she says it. Which means she's either just flat lying, or hasn't put any thought whatsoever in her statement, before she went on national TV. But I'm not a psychologist either. 

I guess the old saying that criminals always need the best attorneys. Well, I don't know who actually said that, but if someone did say that, that is completely true in Donald Trump's case. The problem that he has is that the good, honest, successful lawyers, don't want anything to do for him. Other than perhaps getting the money that he owes from, from the time that they did work for him. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.