CNN: Anderson Cooper 360: 'Maggie Haberman Previews What To Expect From Donald Trump’s Next Trials'

Source:CNN political analyst & New York Times national political reporter/Donald Trump whisperer Maggie Haberman.

"New York Times reporter and CNN senior political analyst Maggie Haberman discusses how former President Donald Trump plans to woo voters away from President Biden in the 2024 presidential race. CNN's Gary Tuchman follows and speaks to undecided voters in the swing state of Georgia about which candidates they support going into the 2024 presidential election." 

From CNN

I guess I agree with everything that Maggie Haberman said here. I would just add a couple of things: 

If, Donald Trump gets to trial. As my colleague Kire Schneider pointed out on Monday and Tuesday on The New Democrat: 

"The Manhattan, New York case against Donald Trump, is the best case in the sense, if you are someone who believes in law and order in America, as well as opposing Donald Trump, because it's the easiest. This is a municipal case, meaning there's no Federal jurisdiction here (unless the Supreme Court claims absolute power) and what he's being charged with in Manhattan, happened 3 months before he ever became any sort of Federal official whatsoever, let alone President of the United States. As well as all the evidence in this case that again happened before he was even elected President in 2016.

So hopefully Judge Juan Merchan will take this appeal quickly and rule against it quickly, as well as denying any stay that the Trump team will probably ask for, why they try to appeal it. And the Supreme Court will stay the hell out of a municipal case." 

From The New Democrat

"Not sure when Michael Popok recorded this video. But if he shot it today, he's the behind the ball on this. Because before Donald Trump can lose a trial, just like before anyone else can lose a trial, you have to get to trial first. Just before you have a glass of water, there has to be water in your glass first. Otherwise you are just trying to drink from an empty glass, perhaps hoping for a last drop or something. And as I wrote yesterday about this case... 

From The New Democrat

My other point here is about Donald Trump using his Manhattan trial (if there ever is a Manhattan trial and conviction before the election) has to do with the old legal advice that defendants should never speak publicly about their ongoing court case, without that advice from their lawyer. Meaning they shouldn't speak to the public about their ongoing court case, without their lawyer agreeing that is even a good idea. Why? Because anything that a defendant says publicly about their own court case, can come back and be used against them in their case by the prosecution. 

If you are familiar with Donald Trump, you know that he can sound like an inmate in jail, waiting on his trial, whose so proud of his crime or crimes, that he either doesn't believe he should even be charged at all, or he simply doesn't care what happens to him as a result. So as a result, this jail inmate, blabbers to other inmates about the crimes he's committed, before he's actually convicted of anything. He gives away his store, before there's any offer to even buy his store. Imagine jail inmate whose also a nihilist. He simply doesn't care what happens to him. 

Donald Trump has a bad habit for himself, but great for the public, at incriminating himself, simply because he lacks all self-discipline and believes he's above the law. So Donald Trump speaking in public about his own criminal trial, with all that evidence and all those witnesses, who either used to work for him, or had an affair with him, should be welcome news to the Manhattan District Attorney and perhaps the Biden White House as well. 

You can also see this post on WordPress.