David Shuster: Jessica Tarlov's FACT-CHECK Leaves Fox News Co-Hosts Reeling

"Fox News’ lone liberal, Jessica Tarlov, calmly shut down the conservative panel with nothing but facts — all live on air. David Shuster breaks it down on Rebel HQ." 

Source:Rebel HQ with a look at Fox News commentator Jessica Tarlov. Who says cuties don't were nerdy glasses? It sure as hell wasn't me.

From Rebel HQ

I guess I have a few responses here to what David Shuster said and then I'll get to what he was talking about as well. 

I don't know if Jessica Tarlov is a "Liberal" or not. I don't watch FOX News for anything, let alone anything to do with Greg Gutfeld who is the host of The Five. But I know The Five panelists are not "Conservatives". I mean, that's obvious. You don't kiss Donald J. Trump's ass for a living, or even pay him so you can kiss his ass publicly... even get on a waiting list (even pay to get on that waiting list) to publicly kiss Donald J. Trump's ass for a living, if you are a "Conservative". For 1 thing: Conservatives like don't porn. Oh, wait: they're just verbally kissing his ass for a living. But that's still not "conservative".

You are not going to find someone in America who is less conservative than Donald J. Trump: 

He doesn't believe in the U.S. Constitution 

He doesn't believe in the rule of law

He doesn't believe in tradition

He doesn't believe in checks and balances

He takes the word of dictators over our own National Security State

He doesn't believe in checks and balances. The facts that he claims to be a king and said he would be a dictator, but just on the first day... pretty good clues there. 

He doesn't believe in fiscal responsibility, or personal responsibility. 6 time bankrupt, Manhattan businessman, who got bailed out by taxpayers during at least 1 of those bankruptcies... pretty good clues there. If that's not enough: 1 of the few times that he's ever been honest and truthful about anything relating to him, was back in 2015 or 16 when he claimed to be the "king of debt". So I guess he is a king after all. 

My point here is, if you devote your professional life to defending Donald Trump for anything that he says and lying all the time to defend that man... you are not a "Conservative" either. I realize that David Shuster comes from the mainstream media before going independent, where they label everyone on the left as 'Liberals" regardless of what their actual politics are and everyone on the right as "Conservatives", regardless of what their politics are. But he's simply wrong about that. 

As far as the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case, Fox News commentator Trey Gowdy (who might actually be a "Conservative") had the perfect response here: 

"What do you think the White House should do in this situation?" MacCallum asked Gowdy during the Tuesday evening broadcast of her show, "The Story With Martha MacCallum."

"I mean, I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge's order and the Supreme Court decision, which used the word 'facilitate,'" Gowdy replied. The Supreme Court's ruling in the case was unanimous.

"Also in that opinion, Martha, were the words 'accidental,' 'mistake' and 'illegal,'" he added. "I mean, those are not three good words you want in a Supreme Court decision."

I will say this: if the press secretary's facts are right, it should be a pretty easy conviction...

"And do I have more confidence in U.S. prisons or El Salvadoran prisons? U.S. prisons," the former GOP lawmaker said. "I have confidence in the U.S. prosecutors. I have more confidence in the U.S. prison system."

He went on to say: "If the president doesn't agree with that, and he may not, then bring him back and then remove him to another country, appeal the removal order. But what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision, even if you disagree with it."

From Newsweek

Trey Gowdy would go on to say (and this might be a paraphrase): "If DOJ has a strong case against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, it should be an easy case and prosecution for them and to win a conviction." 

But that's just it: as Jessica Tarlov said, DOJ's main evidence against Garcia seems to be corrupt police detective, who might also be an alcoholic. But MAGA relying on alcoholics for their information or to work for them is nothing new: just look as the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Which is probably why DOJ doesn't want this case and to bring this man back to America, because he would be released in America like any other American citizen (that he is) who hasn't committed any crimes. 

You can follow me on Threads and Twitter.

You can also see this post on WordPress.