|Source:The New Republic- affirmative action at SCOTUS.|
"When the Supreme Court handed down yesterday’s decision upholding Michigan’s ban on affirmative action, the initial round of hysteria on the left didn’t last long. By afternoon, liberal bloggers and commentators were stressing that the decision in the Schuette case won’t mean the end of affirmative action as we know it. Above the Law, for example, offered 3 reasons affirmative action will still be okay. (1. “It’s up to the Voters”; 2. “College Admissions Committees are Smarter than Voters”; 3. “Private Schools will still be Awesome.”)
From The New Republic
Jeff Rosen, as almost always, hit it on the mark today in his column in The New Republic. He said that whether you agree with the Supreme Court decision on affirmative action at the University of Michigan or not, you should at least agree with how they decided it. Showing judicial restraint, they said that whether you have affirmative action in your state or not, should be decided by democratic processes, through the legislature and the voters. It should be not be left to some unelected board or institution.
Today's so-called Progressives (Socialists, in actuality) are always talking about the need for more democracy in America, that too many important decisions are being left to a handful of people who represent powerful interests. Yet they take the undemocratic position that an institution (in this case the University of Michigan) knows better than the voters themselves whether or not there should be affirmative action at this public university. They believe in affirmative action and will seek to preserve it by any means necessary.
Post a Comment
All relevant comments about the posts you are commenting on are welcome but spam and personal comments are not.