Showing posts with label Politicon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politicon. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

James Carville On Bill Maher & Larry David

"James Carville: Who's Right, Larry David Or Bill Maher.  Politics War Room (with James Carville & Al Hunt)More Politicon videos and podcasts available on our YouTube channel:    / @politicon" 

Source:Politicon with the mad political scientist, James Carville.

From Politicon 

From The Forward: 

"Add Larry David to the list of celebrities who were put off by comedian Bill Maher’s friendly sitdown with President Trump.

In a New York Times opinion piece, “My Dinner with Adolf,” the Jewish creator of “Curb Your Enthusiasm” imagines a get-to-know-you meeting “at the Old Chancellery with the world’s most reviled man, Adolf Hitler.”

The narrator ends up being charmed by the Nazi leader. “I thought that if only the world could see this side of him, people might have a completely different opinion,” he gushes. 

The essay doesn’t mention Maher, but in a newsletter Times deputy opinion editor Patrick Healy acknowledges that David proposed the article in response to Maher’s description of his recent meeting with Trump. Describing their dinner on his Max show “Real Time,” Maher said he found the president to be “gracious and measured” and hardly the “crazy person” he often seems on TV.

According to Healy, David sent him an unsolicited email suggesting his essay. Healy wrote that the Times seeks to avoid Nazi references in the essays it publishes, but felt David’s piece “is not equating Trump with Hitler. It is about seeing someone for who they really are and not losing sight of that.”

David joined other critics of Maher’s conciliatory description of his Trump meeting. “Bill is just the latest in a whole series of people who get had by the personal charm, if you will, of some really bad people,” said Democratic strategist James Carville on his “Politics War Room” podcast.

In a segment on “Real Time,” Washington Post global security analyst Josh Rogin told Maher he was a “prop” in Trump’s “PR stunt.”

In the David piece, the narrator banters amiably with Hitler, who laughs at his jokes. “I realized I’d never seen him laugh before,” he writes. “Suddenly he seemed so human.”

Maher said something similar about Trump in his monologue: “Just for starters, he laughs! I’ve never seen him laugh in public. But he does, including at himself. And it’s not fake.”

In his editor’s note, Healy writes that “David, in a provocation of his own, is arguing that during a single dinner or a private meeting, anyone can be human, and it means nothing in the end about what they’re capable of.”

David, who skewered conservative policies on his long-running HBO show, has often used Nazi references in his satire. As a standup comedian, he would goad audiences by saying “The one thing about Hitler that I admire…” before suggesting that the dictator had no patience for stage magicians. He and Jerry Seinfeld created the “Soup Nazi” character on “Seinfeld,” and “Curb” featured a memorable clash between a Holocaust survivor and a contestant on the reality show “Survivor” who too considered himself a victim.

Such jokes have divided audiences, and even individual critics. In an essay criticizing David for a Holocaust joke he told while hosting “Satruday Night Live” in 2017, Jeremy Dauber praised the “Survivor” episode on “Curb.” “In that ‘Curb’ episode,” writes Dauber, a professor of Jewish literature at Columbia University, “David is searchingly moral, flaying a kind of ethical vacuity and historical relativism about the Holocaust.”

David’s piece is also reminiscent of a 2003 skit by the Jewish comedian Jon Stewart, who imagines Hitler being interviewed by the late Larry King, the ingratiating CNN talk show host.

In his Max monologue, Maher, who positions himself as a centrist truth-teller between political extremes, anticipates the blowback he was sure to receive as a result of his dinner with a deeply polarizing president. “You can hate me for it, but I’m not a liar. Trump was gracious and measured, and why he isn’t that in other settings, I don’t know,” he said." 


If you have been reading The New Democrat since February, you know that we've backed James Carville a lot. But his question: "Who's Right, Larry David Or Bill Maher?", is at best rhetorical, or worst, it's nonsensical. 

Asking "Who's Right, Larry David Or Bill Maher?", is like asking: 

"Who makes better luxury cars: Cadillac or Lincoln?" 

Or, "Who makes better cola: Pepsi or Coke?" 

Or, "Who makes better trucks: Ford or Chevrolet?" 

There isn't 1 right answer to any of these questions because there aren't any real undisputed facts involved. It depends on the customer and what they're looking for and their own personal tastes. 

And my other point here sort of goes to my first point: Bill Maher is not an historian, or journalist, public official. For anyone who was born yesterday: Bill Maher is a comedian, an entertainer, a businessman. If he thinks having dinner with President Trump Donald Trump is good for his business and career, that's what he's going to do. And it's almost pointless to say he's wrong in doing that. 

Leftists, including leftist Democrats used to think of Bill Maher, even as recently as 10-15 years ago, as their latest hipster guru who would lead them to the promise land because he praised socialism and Socialists. But then they discovered that he also believes in personal freedom and free speech, so they sort of dumped him like someone walking around with a bomb that's about to explode and called him a bigot and a lot of other unpleasant things. 

Bill Maher and Larry David are both comedians. (Hopefully that's not a newsflash for anyone who is sane and sober right now) They're going to do what's in the best interests of their careers. Nothing more. 

You can follow me on Threads

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

James Carville: Is It Time For A Schism In The Democratic Party?

"Who is David Hogg and what the hell is he up to ?
James and Al discuss the actions of the Trump administration, the importance of fighting for justice, and the internal dynamics of the Democratic Party. Key themes include the administration's disregard for court orders, the significance of Harvard's resistance to Trump, the need for Democrats to focus on economic issues, and the potential for gains in upcoming elections. The discussion also highlights internal conflicts within the Democratic Party, particularly regarding the direction and priorities of its members." 

Source:Politicon with a look at the mad political scientist James Carville.

From Politicon

The New Democrat has been with James Carville and his strategy for how Democrats should respond to Donald Trump and MAGA from day 1: 

"When you see your arch-enemy is drowning in the ocean. don't throw them a lifeline. Let them drown. 

When you see your arch enemy's house is on fire and no one is there to do anything about it, don't even offer to spit on the fire, let alone dump your own water on it, or call 911. Just let the house burn down. 

Let MAGA burn our national house down. Hopefully they don't destroy the country. But don't help them do that, or try to get in their way, outside of what's going on in the courts and at the state level. Show American voters this is exactly who you voted for and the consequences of that fateful decision. And tell them and show them there's a better way on the campaign trail and why you deserve to be in power again."


I understand James Carville's feelings about what DNC Vice Chairman David Hogg and other left-wingers in the Democratic Party and what they're trying to do, which is literally use Democratic Party funds against other Democrats, especially mainstream Democrats. I mean if it were up to me, every Socialist in America would be shipped out to hippie communes in California and Washington State, with lifetime supply of coffee, pot, French wine and cheese, all the vegetables they can eat... free of charge. 

But, I still live in the real world, (at least politically and before Donald Trump takes over what's left of the real world) and I understand politics well enough that in order to win elections, you have to have more voters than the other party. 

3-10 Democrats right now (perhaps more) are Socialists or Social Democrats, ideologically. Whether they self-described that way or live in the political closet, is a different issue. But ideologically, we're talking about democratic socialists, when you are talking about the left-wing of the Democratic Party. You can't win elections, with perhaps 1/3 of your party staying home, or hanging out at their favorite coffee houses, staring at their phones, listening to their favorite hipster gurus, when they should instead be volunteering, organizing, and voting for Democrats who can actually beat Republicans in 2025-26. 

Long-term, I love would to see the far-left of the Democratic Party get evicted (unless they leave voluntarily) from the Democratic Party and move to the Green Party where they would be a lot more comfortable ideologically and culturally. Or just get out of politics altogether, or move to those hippie communes that I was talking about earlier. 

But until that new tent in the Democratic Party is built, that includes the center-right JFK Democrats, the FDR Progressives, a party that appeals to urban, suburban, as well as small town blue-collar voters, who are interested in economic and national security issues, as well as public safety, who are not cultural warriors... the Democratic Party is still an Al and Peggy Bundy (from Married With Children) marriage of political inconvenience, with two warring factions between mainstream Democrats and the Green Wing Democrats. 

Back in February and really even today short of James Carville's saying that the Socialists should just leave the Democratic Party, Carville was the mad political scientist of American politics... certainly Democratic politics. But telling 1/3 of your own party to get the hell out (or use stronger language, if you want) especially in an off year when you have 2 open gubernatorial races coming up... that just sounds... well, madd. That's just crazy. That's just as bad as the Vice Chairman of the party wanting to use party resources to defeat mainstream Democrats, simply because the far-left doesn't like those Democrats. 

You can follow me on Threads.

You can also see this post on WordPress.

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Nayyera Haq & Jamaal Simmons: Why You Can’t Rely On Politicians

"In this episode of Trailblaze, co-hosts Nayyera Haq and Jamal Simmons chat with Maurice Mitchell, the National Director of the Working Families Party, about the state of politics in America. 

They talk about the idea of a ‘CEO monarch’ in politics, how recent government actions have affected people’s feelings, and why it’s important for communities and grassroots movements to get involved in politics. The conversation stresses the importance of being brave in politics and how regular people can make a difference." 

Source:Politicon with Maurice Mitchell, Jamaal Simmons & Nayyera Haq.

From Politicon

As my colleague Kire Schneider wrote about this back in December: 

"In Defense of Politicians", that would never be 1 of my lines. Not even if I was a defense lawyer defending a politician. I would be in there in court telling the judge: 

"I'm here to defend the politician". But if I win this case, as soon as it's over, I'll be the first person telling the public how big of an asshole I think this person is. And why I've never voted for this politician. Well, not after the first time...

My point here is it's not  just the politicians. It's not just the voters either. It's just mostly the voters. As George Carlin said: 

"Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don’t fall out of the sky. They don’t pass through a membrane from some other reality.

They come from American parents, American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses, American universities, and they’re elected by American citizens.

This is the best we can do, folks. This is what we have to offer. It’s what our system produces. Garbage in…garbage out... 


And as Kire Schneider wrote about this last week: 

"If you are Kamala Harris right now... I doubt she's home right now with her husband Doug laughing their heads off (to keep this clean) at the American voters. At least, the American voters who were too dumb, too blind, too death, (perhaps they flipped a coin in the voting booth to decide who to vote for in 2024) or simply don't give enough of a damn about the United States, to make an intelligent decision in who to vote for. But only because I believe she loves her country and is still willing to do everything that she can to make America as great as it can be.

But, for the people who did vote for Donald Trump because they think he's a cool, wealthy, reality TV star, who hangs out with cool, wealthy, celebrities, who has a gorgeous wife and daughter, who was going to Washington "to shake things up" and "take on the establishment",  I have less than zero sympathy for you. 

American democracy is a serious thing. It's not a high school class presidential election. (No offense to high school class presidential elections) This is not a reality TV show where the winner gets 1 million dollars or, wins a record label, or something... 


I believe Maurice Mitchell made the key point here in the very beginning: 

"The opposition doesn't often come from the sitting politicians. So the people are mad at Chuck Schumer, they're mad at Hakeem Jeffries... you should definitely be mad at all the politicians , voice your displeasure... but political leadership actually comes from the people. And the politicians often respond to where the people move.And its our job politically to fight back, push back, be in opposition. President's aren't kings." 

What Maurice Mitchell said goes to my broader point here. And to paraphrase the great political satirist George Carlin: the politicians are products of the people. Most of them are in office to either stay in office, or move up to higher office. Not serve their constituents. 

So if you want the politicians to do something for you, it has to become popular from them to do it politically. Which is why American democracy, which is liberal democracy (sorry, leftists) always has to be bottom-up, not top-down. You want politicians to do something or do things, you have to get out there and organize and make your movement popular and then they'll listen to you. 

I want to push back a little on what this panel said here. American voters had a very good idea who they were getting when they went to the voting booth in 2024. And if they didn't, it's their fault. 

Corrupt politicians, especially career politicians, rely on ignorant voters. People who don't hold their politicians accountable, who vote for the same crooks and liars over and over, that's the political fuel that crooked politicians need to stay in office and hold onto power. Voter ignorance is for crooked politicians, what gas is to cars, food and water is for humans, etc. 

So when people don't even bother do the homework on the people that they're voting for, before they vote for them: who's fault is that? Of course crooks and liars lie about what they do, but their record is out there and the evidence that shows that they have at least been bought off based on their voting records in Congress, or the legislation that they've signed and proposed and where they get their money to stay in power, is all out in the public record. The records of politicians is out there in the public record. 

It's just a matter of the voters bothering to do their homework and not being completely reliant on the politicians social media feed, how often they "go viral" and for what, the celebrity endorsements that they have, their TV soundbites, etc. 

Nayera Haq and Jamall Simmons said that the voters didn't know that Trump and company would come in and literally try to dismantle the Federal Government. (That's a paraphrase, but pretty close) Project 2025 was part of the public record and part of  The Heritage Foundation's website. It was there as late as last summer, before it started hurting Donald Trump's campaign, because the media kept reporting on it. Project 2025 was part of the presidential debate, that got 70 million viewers. 

I'm willing to bet most of those 70 million viewers were actually American voters. Safe bet they weren't kindergarten kids who stayed up way too late. Perhaps they couldn't sleep or something and thought a political debate could help with that. 

And the voters have always known about Donald Trump's CEO mentality as a politician and that he hates having to work with people that he can't control. And voters knew about Mr. Trump's political relationship with Elon Musk. 

I'll give you an analogy: if you are cheating on a test and you were given the answers to it, but then left the answers in your locker, or your dog literally ate them... perhaps you were cheating off someone who has worst grades than you do, so you fail the test anyway and maybe your teacher doesn't even catch you trying to cheat on it... who's fault is it that you failed that test? 

The 2024 elections was this test. And it was so easy to pass with 1 party there to defend American democracy and the rule of law. And the other party there to defend, protect, to advance off of for their own personal gain, for Donald Trump. Passing that test should've been so easy for any intelligent voter, that it should've been like cheating on a high school test. But they left their cheat sheet in their locker or their dog ate their cheat sheet to this test. 

We've known about Donald Trump and MAGA, at least since 2016. They got elected anyway. The voters woke up for a few years in 2018 and 20, even 22. But then they told pollsters that the price of eggs and milk are too expensive for them to vote for Kamala Harris for President and put Donald Trump back in The White House. Even though they have all the information they need to know that Mr. Trump is literally a threat to our rule of law, form of government, and Constitution. So I have zero sympathy for anyone who voted for Donald Trump and MAGA for any reason or reasons.

You can follow me on Threads.

You can also see this post on WordPress.

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat

John F. Kennedy Liberal Democrat
Source: U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy in 1960